Sunday, March 20, 2011


Week 4 Assignment: Due at the end of Week 4.

Overview

Last week, you engaged in an analysis and wrote a report describing the use of technology and information systems to enrich campus curriculum, enhance teaching and learning, and generally integrate technology into our campus improvement plans to effectively integrate technology and instructional leadership. Your analysis and report should provide the necessary background for the Week 4 major assignment – developing an action plan for gathering, analyzing, and using data from a variety of sources for informed campus decision making focusing on integrating technology, instructional leadership, professional development and organizational leadership.

As a result of this week's assignments, you will be able to:

  • Examine and assess procedures for gathering, analyzing, and using data from a variety of sources for informed decision making regarding the integration of technology, instructional and organizational leadership (SBEC Principal Competency 7 indicator);
  • Design and apply skills for monitoring and evaluating change and making needed adjustments to achieve the campus vision and goals, including the integration of technology as described above (SBEC Principal Competency 7 indicator).

Both of these outcomes are elements of Domain II, Instructional Leadership.

In writing your Week 4 action plan, use your interviews, your readings, including campus and district improvement plans as well as any technology plans, and your Week 3 report to make sure the action plan:

  • Identifies data gathering sources;
  • Provides a description of an organizational chart describing decision making responsibilities regarding the integration of technology from central office personnel to campus leadership and staff;
  • Describes comprehensive professional development activities to achieve your action plan (this may utilize information from the previous three weeks of readings and activities);
  • Includes an evaluation plan to assess the progress and success of the action plan.

Students will be asked to post their action plan on the Discussion Board and each student must review and comment on at least one other action plan focusing on organizational leadership designed to maximize the use of technology in data gathering and decision making.

Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM on the seventh day of Week 4.

Rubric

Use the following Rubric to guide your work on the Week 4 Assignment.

Tasks

Accomplished

Proficient

Progressing

Not Meeting Expectations

Action plan includes an organizational chart identifying key stakeholders in integrating technology and district and campus organizational leadership 

Student completes the organizational flow chart identifying key personnel from the district administration through campus implementation responsible for integrating technology and instructional and organizational leadership. Chart must identify personnel titles responsible for this integration and implementation, and a brief description of the role and responsibilities of all personnel.

(Maximum 20 points)

Student completes the organizational chart with some identification of district and campus personnel, but does not address the roles and responsibilities of personnel in integrating and implementing technology, instructional and organizational leadership.

(18 points)

Student provides a partial organizational chart that does not include all key stakeholders, and does not describe the roles and responsibilities of key personnel.

(16 point)e

Student does not complete the organizational chart or description of roles and responsibilities.

(0 points)

Comprehensive professional development plan(s) designed to achieve the action plan of integrating technology with instructional and organizational leadership.

Student describes a professional development plan or activities designed to achieve the action plan of integrating technology with instructional and organizational leadership. To achieve maximum credit, the professional development plan(s) must:

  • Reference analysis and lessons learned about the technology needs from the Week 3 report
  • Addresses professional development designed to improve the gathering, analysis and use of data from a variety of sources
  • Includes professional development to improve decision making in the integration of technology with instructional and organizational leadership.

(Maximum 20 points)

Student provides a professional development plan(s) that address two of the three bulleted items from the Accomplished column.

(18 points)

Student provides a professional development plan(s) that addresses only one of the three bulleted items from the Accomplished column.


 

(16 points)

Student fails to develop a professional development plan(s).

(0 points)

Evaluation plan to assess the progress and success of the action plan.

The action plan must also include an evaluation plan that provides measurable outcomes designed to address the following:

  • Uses data and other analysis from the Week 3 report, including using the campus and district improvement plans, and local or state technology plans;
  • Provides assessments and/or monitoring reports measuring professional development designed to use technology to improve the gathering, analysis and use of data from a variety of sources
  • Provides assessments and/or monitoring evaluating professional development to improve decision making in the integration of technology with instructional and organizational leadership.

.

(Maximum 20 points)

Student provides an evaluation plan that addresses two of the bulleted items from the Accomplished column.

(18 points)

Student provides an evaluation plan that addresses only one of the bulleted items from the Accomplished column.

(16 point)

Student fails to include an evaluation plan in the Week 4 action plan.

(0 points)

Posting action plan on the Discussion Board and on their blog, and provides evidence of reviewing and commenting on action plans of other students.

Student posts their action plan on the Discussion Board and on their blog and provides evidence, through written comments, of reviewing and reflecting on at least two other student's action plan.

(Maximum 20 points)

Student posts their action plan on the Discussion Board and on their blog and provides evidence, through written comments, of reviewing and reflecting on one other student's action plan.


 

(18 points)

Student posts their action plan on the Discussion Board and on their blog but does not provide any comments or reflections on the action plans of other students.


 

(16 point)

Student does not post on the Discussion Board or on their blog.


 

(0 points)

Assignment Mechanics 

Responses are relevant to course content; student uses correct APA writing mechanics; no errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation.

(Maximum 10 points)

Responses are relevant to course content; one or two errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation, including APA writing mechanics.

(8 points)

Responses are relevant to course content; more than three errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation including APA writing mechanics Needs


(6 point)Improvement

Responses do not reflect knowledge of course content, lack clarity and depth, and/or include multiple errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, including APA errors.

(0 points)


 

The following four parts to the Week 4 assignments should help you complete an action plan that incorporates all four elements of the assignment, including posting your action plan and commenting and reflecting on the action plans shared by fellow students.


 

Week 4 Assignment, Part 1: Development of an organization chart integrating technology

Using the campus and district improvement plans, and any suggested technology improvements, develop an organization chart that includes the following:


 

  • Identify by title or job description all personnel/stakeholders responsible for integrating technology and instructional and organization leadership from the district office to the campus and classroom;
  • Provide a brief description of the role and responsibilities of all identified personnel in your organizational chart;
  • Discuss the role of the principal in making sure the organizational chart is implemented and monitored.


     

The principal's role regarding the organizational chart's implementation and monitoring is necessary because he or she must be certain the district and state technology mandates are carried out on their campus. They are also responsible for the funding and professional development necessary to carry out these mandates. The principal should also lead by example setting himself up as a digital native and leading others toward that goal.


 


 



 


 

Week 4 Assignment, Part 2: Professional Development Planning

Using the campus and district improvement plans, and any suggested technology improvements, develop professional development activities that include the following:


 

  • Reference analysis and lessons learned about the technology needs from the Week 3 report;
  • Addresses professional development designed to improve the gathering, analysis and use of data from a variety of sources;
  • Includes professional development to improve decision making in the integration of technology with instructional and organizational leadership.


     


 


 

Robbye Rusek EDLD 5352/1219

        Technology Plan

    

Goal: Teachers and students will meet technology proficiency requirements.

Area of Focus 

Professional Development 

Responsible Professional 

Timeline 

Post Evaluation

All students will meet the technology proficiency requirements for their grade level or course based upon the

Technology Applications TEKS.

District will provide ongoing campus and district level professional development on how to implement student technology techniques. Must be based on the campus STaR chart data. 

Teachers, Campus Technology Coordinator, District Technology Coordinator 

ongoing

Student projects, skill books, examples


 

All educators will meet the technology proficiency requirements for district employees based on district mandates for educators.


 

District will provide ongoing campus and district level technology professional development for teachers and administrators, to help them reach their goals.

Campus Principal, District Technology Coordinator, Campus Technology, Coordinator 

ongoing 

Teacher lesson plans, STaR chart data, campus technology proficiency list, teacher sign-in sheets


 

Teachers will have a working knowledge of the STaR chart and its importance in the development of district and campus level technology goals, objectives, and professional, development 


 

STaR chart training for all teachers will include instructions for accessing and completing the survey. Teachers will then learn how the data is disaggregated and used to help plan for technology.


 

Campus Principal, District Technology Coordinator, Campus Technology, Coordinator


 

24 months 


 

STaR chart completion rates, teacher sign-in sheets for training sessions

     


 

Goal: Provide and implement a technology curriculum for grades K-8 that address the Technology Application TEKS.

Area of Focus 

Professional Development 

Responsible Professional 

Timeline 

Post Evaluation

Teachers will implement at least one technology based lesson per grading period. 

District will provide ongoing campus and district level professional development on how to implement technology based lesson plans.

Classroom teachers, Campus Technology Coordinator

24 months 

Lesson plans, sign-in sheets from trainings 

Support instruction in all curriculum areas through the integration of technology in labs, classrooms, and media centers

Campus level administrators will attend appropriate training at Service Center.

Campus Principal, Campus Technology Coordinator 

Ongoing 

Sign-in sheets at ESC, Campus principal models newly acquired technology skills and is a leader in technology on his or her campus 

Correlate technology lessons to the district vertical alignment documents.

District will provide opportunities for core curriculum coordinators to meet and plan with technology coordinators to help with vertical alignment documents 

District Technology Coordinator, Campus Technology Coordinator, Core Curriculum Coordinators

12 months 

Product: Technology lessons will be aligned to the vertical alignment documents 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

Goal: Increase the effective use of technology as a tool to design, deliver, and evaluate meaningful and engaging

learning experiences for students.


 

Evaluate the level of technology proficiency of all teachers, librarians, and instructional specialists in

accordance with SBEC's Technology Standards for All Teachers.

Teachers, Librarians, and Instructional Specialist will attend training on SBEC's Technology Proficiency Standards. These trainings will be available on each campus and will be integrated with other technology training opportunities.

Campus Technology Coordinator, District Technology Coordinator, Principal 

24 months 

On line tests, documentation from campus technology coordinator

Require all teachers, librarians, and instructional specialists who do not meet the minimum SBEC Technology

Standards requirements to participate in staff development and meet the requirements within two years.

Teacher, Librarians, and instructional specialists who do not meet the SBEC requirements will receive additional, intensive, technology based interventions.  

Campus Technology Coordinator, District Technology Coordinator, Principal 

24 months 

Minimum standards will be reassessed until mastery is achieved.

Require all teachers, librarians, and instructional specialists to complete a Teaching with Technology course.

Courses will be offered online and will be self-paced but each course must be completed within 6 months of beginning.

Campus Technology Coordinator, District Technology Coordinator, Principal

Ongoing 

Documented teacher log-ins to the courseware and successful completion of the end of course assessment 

     


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

Robbye Rusek EDLD 5352/1219


 


 


 


 


 

Week 4 Assignment, Part 3: Evaluation Planning for Action Plan

The technology action plan integrating instructional an organizational leadership must include evaluation components that provide measurable outcomes designed to address the following:


 

  • Uses data and other analysis from the Week 3 report, including using the campus and district improvement plans, and local or state technology plans;
  • Provides assessments and/or monitoring reports measuring professional development designed to use technology to improve the gathering, analysis and use of data from a variety of sources;
  • Provides assessments and/or monitoring evaluating professional development to improve decision making in the integration of technology with instructional and organizational leadership.


 


 


 

4 Assignment, Part 4: Posting your Action Report and Responding to Other Students' action plans

Using the discussion board and the blog that you have developed, please write and post your action plan, and be sure to:

  • Read and review at least two other action plans
  • Respond to other action plans by posting your comments and reflections


     

The purpose of the action report is to provide you with recommended procedures for gathering, analyzing, and using data from a variety of sources for informed campus decision making focusing on the effective integration of technology in curriculum, instruction, assessment and professional development. Students may wish to use this action plan as one of your school improvement projects for your Electronic Portfolio. You may also use the Week 3 and Week 4 assignments as campus supervised hours for your internship logs. As indicated these two weeks fall under Domain II, Instructional Leadership, and address elements of Competencies 4, 5 and 7.

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Webcast Observations

Going into the webcast I had no preconceived notions because I had never participated in one before. The first one for this class, however, was probably not a great first experience. There were over a hundred participants and the kinks had not been worked out of the system yet. The only way to really follow the conversation was to read the script. Even that was like standing in the middle of a crowd and trying to listening to the conversations all around you. I honestly felt like I had lost an hour of my life for no reason. There were far more questions than answers. The most important question,which was "can we get the overviews further ahead of time?" received no answer. Like the entire course so far, it was a very frustrating experience.

Webcast Observations

Friday, March 4, 2011

Texas STaR Chart Presentation

South Waco Elementary technology progress from 2006-2009. Enjoy!

Blog #2

Good Grief! This is an endless document that only a governmental entity would come up with and think it could actually do some good. Filled with legalese and endless add-ons, as best I could tell, The Texas Long Range Plan for Technology is broken down into several areas, the first of which is legislative mandates for technology in Texas. There are two interim reports on TIP (Texas Immersion Pilot) and Texas Virtual School Network. These reports include all the data gathered from these reports. Other areas of the report represent sections highlighting progress made in each of the following categories: Teaching and Learning; Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support; Education Preparation and Development; Infrastructure for Technology. This endless tome also includes data from the Texas STaR Chart for Students as well as the ever popular Texas STaR Chart for Teachers. The conclusion of this report is a summary of the recommendations for all of the state’s regional education centers. It emphasizes that these same educational service centers are vital in disseminating the vast amounts of information from the state to the many local school districts that they serve. The results from the NetDay Speak Up 2007 survey are also included in this report. It is represented in the report by student voices for different grade level ranges. One should take note that for every grade level, students responded that technology was a very important part of their life and how they function at home, at school, and in the world at large. Parents were included in this survey and felt that they, too, had better communication with their children and with teachers and schools because of technology. Happily, only 10% of teachers considered themselves to be beginners in technology, while 59% of educators felt that their computer skills were average.

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Blog #3

Education Secretary Arne Duncan says the goal of the plan is to “dramatically improve teaching and learning, personalize instruction and ensure that the educational environments we offer to all students keep pace with the 21st century.” Technology is to be the vehicle that drives into a successful new land of teaching and learning. There is an emphasis on competencies such as critical thinking, complex, problem, solving, collaboration, and multimedia communication. Technology is to be a tool for differentiated instruction that helps us move away from the one size fits all way of thinking.
One of the goals to be addressed is having adequate broadband and wireless access inside and outside schools.
There is to be at least one internet enabled device for every student and educator… at school and at home.
Open licenses and the use of “Creative Commons” for course content are to be used as well as OpenCourseWare efforts.
Efforts will be made towards research and development in gaming, simulations, and virtual worlds for both instruction and testing.
Cloud computing for districts will be encouraged.
Adaptive (student responsive) computer assessment tools are to be developed and made accessible.
FERPA changes are to be made to make access to student data and enable better portability for student and financial records.
Rethinking in how to change CIPA to open access to the Internet and also rethink hoe schools filters work.
When one reads the vast and sweeping changes in this technology plan, the educator in me says ”Whoopee!” while the taxpayer in me says, “Wait a minute! How can we possibly pay for all this?”

Blog #1

A lack of professional development in technology use can be one of the largest obstacles towards fully integrating technology into the classroom. Having teachers who are completely comfortable and literate with up-to-date technology will help the technology to be aligned with learning goals and to be used in engaged learning projects. One time only professional development days will not meet the needs of educators. On-going professional development is the only way to have a truly successful technology professional development program. Teachers and administrators are not likely to be enthusiastic about using digital technology if they do not have a relatively high degree of confidence in their abilities to use the both the hardware and the software. Their enthusiasm will, therefore, be contagious to not only their students, but to their fellow professionals. The biggest obstacle to overcome is not the actual conquering of the “how to work it”, but “how to work it seamlessly into the require curriculum”. That is going to be the much greater concept to help teachers grasp. One way to approach a successful professional development program for technology is to make it an integral part of the technology plan. It will need to be a part of the technology budget and should be planned for by a knowledgeable technology education team. In our district, we have had a long history of finding money, buying a bunch of shiny new toys (like hardware or software) and the, not having the foresight to include budget money for on-going professional development so that the new purchases can be well used. Another issue in our district is paying for licenses that many schools and their faculty are not even aware that we have access to, so they are underused.